Friday 13 July 2007

LIVERPOOL CARE CRISIS GETS EVEN WORSE!

PRIVATE CARE PROVIDERS LYNHURST HAVE TODAY GIVEN NOTICE OF LIQUIDATION, LEAVING OVER 500 VULNERABLE AND ELDERLY SERVICE USERS AT RISK!

LIVERPOOL CITY COUNCIL HAVE KNOWN FOR WEEKS THAT THIS WOULD HAPPEN YET THEY HAVE DONE NOTHING TO PREVENT IT!

350 HOME CARER STAFF FROM LIVERPOOL CITY COUNCIL WERE RECENTLY GIVEN NOTIFICATION OF REDUNDANCIES!

JUST WHAT THE HELL IS GOING ON IN THIS CITY?

READ BELOW FOR TODAY'S REPORT...





Liverpool care firm collapse hits 500 patients

Jul 13 2007


by Jessica Shaughnessy, Liverpool Daily Post


A HOME care agency relied on by hundreds of Liverpool’s most vulnerable people is to go into liquidation.

Lyndhurst Home Care will shut down today, leaving more than 500 service users, mostly elderly, and 200 carers uncertain of their future.

The closure comes just weeks after the company warned that controversial changes in city council contracts would drive it out of business.

Liverpool City Council last night moved to reassure the elderly people dependent on the agency that plans were already in place to look after them.

But care industry insiders say the news spells the start of a “wake-up call” for the authority. Tearful carers, who will not be officially informed by Lyndhurst, about the redundancies until a meeting at 3pm today, last night accused company directors of keeping them in the dark.

One said: “We feel used and let down. Our future has been hanging in the balance since the new contracts were signed weeks ago.

“We were encouraged by our managers to campaign against the council and attend meetings. We stuck up for Lyndhurst.

“They have been planning this for days and they have not told us a thing. We have only heard rumours.”

In a legal letter written to the council days before it went under, Lyndhurst blamed recent controversial contract changes, and asked for an urgent meeting in a last ditch-bid to avoid liquidation.

The letter said: “The implications of making staff redundant will be that some 525 service users will not receive care from the company.

“This may result in life-threatening situations for those service users that have a high degree of dependency on the care provided.

“The company has attempted on a number of occasions to raise these concerns with Liverpool City Council. Despite these efforts, no constructive response has been received.

“The company wishes to avoid any liquidation proceedings and would seek to meet with LCC as a matter of urgency to try and resolve this situation.” But this week no compromise agreement was reached, and the company will now fold.

The carers and services users are now being divided between three of the city’s other care providers, Merseycare Julianne, Homecarers and Local Solutions.

Managers at the firms and council officers are said to have been working around the clock over the last three days to ensure as smooth a transition as possible.

The council says that where possible, patients will be transferred to a new company with their existing carer.

Officers were last night contacting as many carers as possible to tell them which company they will be working for from tomorrow.

Executive director of community services Tony Hunter said: “Our first priority is the safety and care of our clients.

“I am pleased that we have been able to work very closely with our other providers, who have shown great professionalism and commitment during this challenging period in agreeing to take on the additional work at extremely short notice.

“Our commitment to providing excellent services will continue throughout this transition period and the city council and its contractors will be providing advice and support, and overseeing the entire process until all of the necessary arrangements are in place.

“Every single person who receives care from Lyndhurst will be receiving a letter from the city council outlining the process and how the new arrangements will be implemented.”

The city’s home care industry warned its future was unstable after their contracts were changed.

The terms meant that carers faced a pay cut of up to 30% and in the weeks after the companies signed up, staff walked out in their droves.

But last night, one home care manager said the future would be more certain for the other companies. He said: “A major problem for all of the companies was that we were given less hours on a lower rate.

“Now the agencies left over have more hours, it means we will become more viable.”

GMB regional organiser Karen Atkinson said last night that unions and staff were still in the dark about the developments.

She said: “We asked Lyndhurst only this morning what was going on and they denied they were closing.

“The staff are very distressed. Some of them say they have not received the right wages in two weeks.”

Cllr Roz Gladden, Labour chairwoman of the Health and Social Care Select Committee, said: “This has been on the cards for weeks and the council did not listen and now there is chaos. This is no way to run a service.”

Last night, the director of Lyndhurst, Len Collins, was unavailable for comment.

* SERVICE users or carers who would like information about arrangements made for their care or future employment should call the city council’s Careline call centre on 0151 233 3019.

  • READ more news from the Liverpool Daily Post

  • Top Top

    Print this article Close window


    Thursday 5 July 2007

    LIVERPOOL CARE CRISIS CONTINUED



    AS LIVERPOOL ELDERLY AND VULNERABLE RESIDENTS FACE MORE UPSET AND FEAR, FROM THE PROPOSED AND IMPLIMENTED CHANGES IN THE PRIVATE CARE SECTOR AND ALSO THE IN HOUSE HOME CARE SERVICE OF THE COUNCIL, HAVE MEANT ONCE AGAIN THE PEOPLE WHO RELY UPON THE CARERS AND THE SERVICES THEY PROVIDE ARE PUNISHED.Councillor Antrobus, the Liberal Democrat who voted to cut your care!


    READ BELOW FOR DETAILS OF HOW CHANGES IN THE LAW WILL ALSO HAVE A MAJOR EFFECT UPON THE VERY PEOPLE WE ARE SUPPOSED TO BE LOOKING AFTER!

    Elderly face soaring home-help charges

    By STEVE DOUGHTY - More by this author » Last updated at 00:25am on 2nd July 2007

    Comments Comments (1)

    elderly woman

    Hundreds of thousands of elderly people are paying huge charges for home help


    Hundreds of thousands of elderly people are facing steep charges for home-help, a report will say this week.

    The rate at which town halls are cutting back on meals-on-wheels and help with dressing, cleaning and shopping is increasing fast, the study has found.

    It means thousands of frail and vulnerable people face a growing f

    inancial struggle to live in their own homes.

    For many, the only alternative will be moving to a residential care home, where the council only pays the bill once they have exhausted residents' savings.

    The accelerating cutbacks are set out in a survey conducted by the Counsel and Care charity.

    It found that two out of three social services departments provide-free help at home to only the most dependent and disabled householders, and that the number of councils restricting free services went up by 15 per cent last year.

    Local government chiefs have themselves warned that 400,000 people will lose free help at home by 2009.

    Those who are forced to pay are charged an average of more than £160 a week, with some town halls demanding £320 - roughly the average weekly income for retired couples.

    Each local authority has its own means testing system for deciding who should receive help to live at home.

    The Daily Mail's Dignity for the Elderly campaign has exposed the pain and loss caused by the system, which forces many to go into care homes and sell their houses to meet the bills.

    Last year an influential report by former Treasury troubleshooter Sir Derek Wanless called for a major increase in Government spending on homehelp services.

    He found that those who stay in their own homes are happier and cheaper to help.

    Sir Derek accused council social services departments of trying to push the elderly into care homes in order to grab the value of their property.

    Stephen Burke, of Counsel and Care, said: "Our figures show the social care problem will not solve itself.

    "Without active intervention, the system is going to collapse as more and more people need to be cared for at home."


    WILL THIS BE ONE OF YOUR RELATIVES AFTER WAITING FOR CARE?

    SIGN THE PETITION FOR INCREASE IN BUDGETS FOR CARE, CLICK HERE

    Wednesday 4 July 2007

    Gordon Brown moves further towards giving Local Authorities more power in decision making

    Gordon Brown has announced changes that will give local authorities a stronger voice in DECISION MAKING


    Brown’s regional ‘question time’

    A NEW regional question time will be held in the House of Commons to give the likes of Merseyside a more powerful voice, Gordon Brown announced yesterday.

    The Prime Minister unveiled radical plans to hold monthly question-and-answer sessions with the new ministers for the regions, appointed last week.

    And he called for select committees to be set up for each of the eight English regions, with the power to hold evidence sessions with ministers and produce reports.

    The regional ministers will also answer written questions and speak for the Government in relevant Commons debates.

    Mr Brown said the shake-up – part of wider plans for constitutional change – would “increase the accountability of local and regional decision-making”.

    That is an issue that has been in paralysis since the embarrassing collapse of plans for elected regional assemblies three years ago.

    The Prime Minister told MPs: “I propose the House consider creating committees to review the economies and public services of each region.

    “And we will propose a regular question time for regional ministers.”

    The day after reaching No10 last week, Mr Brown announced that Beverley Hughes, MP for Stretford, in Greater Manchester, would be Minister for the North West.

    The eight ministers would be “regional champions” to ensure they punch their weight in Government, but details of their role were vague.

    Now Mr Brown has published an official list of responsibilities, which include economic development and advising the Government on the approval of regional statrategies.

    Ms Hughes will also play a role in the appointment of the chairman and board members of the North West Regional Development Agency.

    And she will “champion the region at high level events”, such as sporting events or, perhaps next year’s Capital of Culture celebrations.

    But the most high-profile part of the job will be in Parliament, including answering written questions and speaking for the Government in relevant Commons debates.

    All those decisions rest with the Commons modernisation select committee, but are likely to prove popular with MPs on all sides.

    However, David Cameron said the shake-up would not go far enough if it rejected ‘English votes for English laws’, following devolution in Scotland and Wales.

    The Conservative leader said: “I have to tell him that question time with regional ministers just doesn’t cut it.”

    The package unveiled yesterday also contained proposals to move elections to the weekend and to allow the public to pick parliamentary debates through petitions.

    The Prime Minister also pledged to give MPs the final word in declaring war.

    Tuesday 3 July 2007

    Henshaw and the evil cabal: JUNE 27, 2007 - IT'S THE END OF AN ERROR AS THE GRATE MAN FINALLY STEPS DOWN

    Henshaw and the evil cabal: JUNE 27, 2007 - IT'S THE END OF AN ERROR AS THE GRATE MAN FINALLY STEPS DOWN

    LIVERPOOL CITY ELDERLY CARE CRISIS






    Care workers’ may take legal action if wages are cut

    UNDERPAID care workers may mount a wave of legal action against Liverpool care agencies if they see a 30% pay cut, it emerged last night.

    Private care companies say they have no choice but to cut staff pay after contract changes by the city council – which unions say could drive some workers to industrial action.

    Last night, agencies said com-plicated EU employment laws which protect staff’s rights could leave them open to legal action by employees – which they fear could push them out of business.

    But the city council insisted it could not get involved in person- nel issues, and union leaders warned the buck stops with the employer.

    One care agency source said: “It could get very messy. When the changes are implemented from July 1, staff know they face big pay-cuts. Contrary to what the council might say, we work by tight profit margins. If the coun- cil pays us less, we have to pay the carers less. But the council do not pay carers, we do, so we are the ones who have to sort it out.”

    The agencies are concerned about a complicated European legislation called TUPE (Transfer of Undertakings), designed to protect employees when work is transferred to another firm. It means new employers cannot change their contract terms.

    Another senior member of staff at a city care agency said: “No-one knows for certain exactly how TUPE is going to affect us. But, after taking advice, we have been warned that when the new contracts are implemented and a lot of clients are transferred to different agencies, the staff may be entitled to go with them.

    “That would mean we would be unable to change their terms and conditions. We would have to pay what they are on now and under the new contracts it will mean we are not viable.”

    GMB regional organiser Karen Atkinson said not only could the care companies face legal action under TUPE, but they may face collective industrial action.

    She said: “The council may have implemented the changes initially, but it doesn’t necessar-ily follow that the companies have to follow through with them. They could put in more money of their own, they should talk with the unions.

    “If the staff feel strongly enough about it, they could take a legal action under TUPE. But they could also take collective action on the grounds of change of contract.”

    Executive director for social services Tony Hunter said: “Unfortunately, we just can’t get involved in staffing issues of private sector firms. The employees do not work for the council – they work for private organisations. I would certainly expect any professional and well-established company to take advice and fully investigate the implications of taking on staff from other agencies before doing so.”

    Yesterday, Wavertree MP Jane Kennedy asked the Department of Health what measures were in place to protect the income of care staff working for contract-ors commissioned by a local authority and to ensure employers did not pay less than the statutory minimum wage.

    Mrs Kennedy said: “Carers in Liverpool do a vital job and are already on low incomes. If wages are to be cut, it could spell disaster for the city.”

    jessicashaughnessy@dailypost.co.uk





    SHAMEFUL